Warning: This story and accompanying picture are rather graphic. They are likely to make you sick, sad, and angry. Angry enough that you are spurred into action to make sure that this never happens to another dog in Dallas or anywhere else.
That is precisely our intent.
Updates will be posted as they are received. Scroll to the bottom to read the latest events.
June 28, 2002
Mariah's Story Begins
Note: This girl had no name, so to prevent her from being another nameless statistic we have chosen to call her Mariah.
The witness was at the front gate of the McCommas Landfill in Dallas
when he heard a dog howling and screaming from a City of Dallas
Sanitation Vehicle. The witness
followed the truck around to the "Dog Pit" where he witnessed the
Sanitation Worker dumping 50 to 60 animal carcasses while at the same
time burying the injured
suffering rottie as it continued to howl and scream in pain. As I have
interviewed the witness, there is no doubt in my mind that the
Sanitation Worker intentionally and
knowingly committed this act of felony animal cruelty. This was
torture. The witness actually climbed down into this horrific pit of
decaying animals and uncovered the
screaming dog in an attempt to comfort her while we were in route.
|
Mariah (circled in red) after having the carcasses of other animals taken off of her by the witness who heard her tortured screams. |
As I arrived on scene I was met by the McCommas Landfill Manager, John
Barlow. I informed Mr. Barlow that the Dallas Police Department had
been called and that they
were on their way. He stated that Dallas Animal Control had been called
to identify the deceased rottie. At that time we requested that Dallas
Animal Control also verify
death on the remaining animals in the pit. Mr. Barlow agreed when DAC
arrived and if they stated the dog did not come from Dallas Animal
Control, then after the police
had completed their part of the investigation at the scene, HSGD could
transport the dog to a local vet to perform a complete Necropsy.
Three officers from DAC arrived and we were all escorted back to the dog
pit. The witness identified the dead rottie and gave an account of what
he had witnessed. A DAC
Officer stepped down into the pit with us where he began to search the
legs of the rottie for alleged shave marks from the euthanasia. Before
he could complete this, a
DAC Supervisor walked up and stated that this was not their dog.
ABSOLUTELY NOT!!!! I find this hard to believe as he was not close
enough to make this assessment.
When informed that we were awaiting the arrival of Dallas PD, the DAC
Supervisor stated that they were removing the dog from the pit and
transporting it to Forney Road. I
explained to him that the Police were on their way and that this was a
possible crime scene as a Felony had occurred. He said he had orders
from his supervisor to
remove the dog as it was the property of the city of Dallas. I
requested that he radio his supervisor and relay my concerns. He did
and they still removed the evidence
from the scene. From that point forward the City of Dallas refused to
cooperate with HSGD and continued to destroy the evidence.
"It's not our dog, but we're taking it anyway." Yes, I have issues with
the actions they took. As I see it, regardless of where this dog came
from, the City of Dallas on
Friday evening believed it to be a threat, as they removed all evidence
from the original crime scene. They cannot say they were ignorant as
every step of the way they
were reminded of the proper procedure of handling a crime scene dealing
with Animal Cruelty. As I was told by Cheritta Johnson of Dallas Code
Compliance, all decisions
were being made by Ted Benividas, Dallas City Manager. Again, as any
other investigator would, I have issues with the same agency that has
committed a possible
offense handling their own evidence. As I have worked in the Dallas
area for over a year, DAC has NEVER pulled an animal out of a crime
scene for a Necropsy. Every
criminal report that has been filed in the City for animal cruelty in
the past two years list DAC as the department called to pick up and
dispose of the dead animals. This
was the most mishandled and questionable case I have ever been involved
with. So yes, be very upset by the actions of the City and let them
know how corruption will not
be tolerated.
Dee Stephens, Chief Investigator
July 9, 2002
The Dallas Police, after saying at the land fill that they were going to
file the report as animal cruelty, have actually filed it as
"miscellaneous incident". They are saying that since the dog was going
to be euthanized anyhow that it wasn't cruelty. So now the Police are
saying that torture is an acceptable form of euthanasia, I guess.
Word is getting around about this atrocity. The Humane Society of
Greater Dallas was answering phone calls all day. One call came in
from the State Attorney's office in Maryland.
TC
July 10, 2002
There is positive news today. The District Attorney's office seems to
want to get to the bottom of things. According to Councilwoman Veletta
Lill, the information regarding possible official wrongdoing has been
referred to the Public Integrity Section of the Dallas Police
Department.
TC
July 14, 2002
The Animal Shelter Commission meeting was held last Thursday. The
Chairman refused to open the meeting up to a discussion of the land fill
incident. He reasoning was that it was under investigation.
Also the director of Animal Services, Sam Rice, was doing a blatant snow
job on the commission. He tried to dazzle them with numbers and no
substance regarding implementation of the 370+ recommendations in the
Humane Society of the U.S. report from last Fall. My feeling was that
he was stalling until the very end of the term for the commission and
then will throw out all this information that they will not be able to
verify.
Also there was two incidents a week apart involving misuse of a catch
pole by the same Animal Control officer. In the first incident the
dog died. Mr. Rice was supposed to report the outcome of his
investigation into these incidents that occurred in March or April. He
refused to do so. He said he hadn't completed his investigation after
four months. This is not rocket science here and there wasn't that
many people to interveiew to get information. It was real interesting
during the public comment section at the end after Mr. Rice had
stonewalled on this incident because the witness to one of the catch
pole incidents spoke. She said the dog was completely docile and the
officer had it gasping for breath and its eyes bulging out. She got
choked up and paused. The Chair tried to move on and she forcefully
said, "I'm NOT finished." No one tried to interupt her after that.
Also the Chief Investigator for the Humane Society announced to the
commission that she will no longer try to work with Animal Control when
there is a report of cruelty on behalf of one of their officers, but
will go directly to the Police Dept. Public integrity section.
TC
July 23, 2002
More about the corruption in Dallas Animal Control is continuing to come
out, I guess, because some people have had enough. There was an
officer who was reported last November for dragging a dog by it's
hocks. The person who reported it tried to go through channels and of
course, nothing was done. Then when the cat was found dying in a cage
becauses of the botched euthanasia in February, the dragging of the dog
incident got into the media also. Then something was done after four
months because of the media coverage and the offiicer was suspended.
It turns out this same officer was reported prior to the dragging
incident for slamming dogs against the wall. Guess what? Since this
didn't make the media, nothing was done.
Also I talked to the assistant to one of the City Council members
today. They had promised an update on the city's investigation last
week. I never got it. It turns out the City Council cannot even get
an update. I guess the city staff is hoping everything will just die
down. What is embarrassing for the city though is that the attention
being shown nationwide and even worldwide is growing and the City
Council is seeming to be impotent since they cannot even find out what
is going on. The Assistant City Manage wrote them a letter on July 2,
2002, and they have not been able to get any information since then.
TC
July 25, 2002
Tonight on the local DFW news on Channel 8 there was a story about
Haltom City Animal Control bringing a cruelty case against an individual
for starving a dog. The dog is recovering. What I thought was
interesting about this story is that the much smaller city of Haltom
City has an animal control department that takes seriously their
comminttment to animal care as well as control. They will charge
someone who is obviously abusing animals. When I was at the Animal
Shelter Commission meeting, Mr. Sam Rice reported that they had gotten a
large number of owner releases. I think the number was something like
400 owner releases for abuse and/or cruelty and no criminal charges
filed in any of these cases. What this means is that when animal
control finds a bad situation they get the animal's owner to release the
animal. More than likely the animal is then euthanized and the owner
is free to go get another puppy or whatever to abuse. We have a new
felony abuse law and the City of Dallas is not enforcing it. I'm sure
all the groups and individuals who fought so hard for this law are not
happy that it is not being enforced in Dallas.
Also it is with a great deal of sadness and a deep concern, that I
announce that Dee Stephens has resigned her position with Humane Society
of Greater Dallas. I am sad to see someone leave who was really making
a difference by aggressively pursuing animal abuse wherever she found
it. I am deeply concerned because I don't see that there is anyone
else that will do what she has done in Dallas. As far as I know the
SPCA is not really active in investigating abuse. The City of Dallas
Animal Control has no interest in bringing abusers to justice. The
Humane Society of Greater Dallas may pursue a few noncontroversial
cases, but considering the close relationship that the leadership of the
Humane Society has with Animal Control, there probably will not be much
done to stop the abuse within the Animal Control Department itself.
Sam Rice has shown he is not interested to stopping it in the general
public or within his own department unless the media brings it to the
public's attention.
TC
July 26, 2002
Most of you know about the incident at the land fill involving the
screaming dog buried alive by the city sanitation worker.
Dee Stephens, Chief Investigator, for the Humane Society of Greater
Dallas was called to the
scene and tried to investigate possible felony animal abuse. Animal
control wound up removing the evidence before the police came, over
Dee's objections and supposedly on orders of the city manager. Now I
have information that when Dee called in that she was on the way out to
the landfill, Pat Davis, President, of Humane Society of Greater Dallas
in turn called Sam Rice, Director of Animal Control and warned him.
It is also my understanding that Ms. Davis has also been keeping Animal
Control informed throughout the investigation. I have no confirmation
of this information, but I believe it to be accurate. It might be
something to ask Ms. Davis if anyone gets a chance. I do know that
Dee turned in her resignation shortly after announcing to the Animal
Shelter Commission that she was not going to try to work with Animal
Control in the tuture on reports of cruelty and abuse within Animal
Control. Instead she said she would go directly to the Public
Integrity Division of the Dallas Police Dept. This was also after Sam
Rice's stonewalling of the Commission regarding two catch pole incidents
involving the same officer four months prior. In one of those incidents
the dog died. Mr. Rice told the Commission he still had not finished
his investigation after four months.
It is a sad situation that we have lost Dee since she was the only
person actively pursuing cruelty investigation in Dallas involving
citizens and Animal Control itself. It sounds like now that no one
will be looking into cruelty within Animal Control anymore.
TC
July 27, 2002
Regarding my statement that Pat Davis, President of Humane Society of
Greater Dallas, called Sam Rice and warned him that her investigator was
on the way out to the land fill, I did hear from someone else on this
today. This person told me that Pat's daughter was with her when the
investigator called in about the live dog at the land fill, and the
daughter urged her to call Sam Rice and let him know in case there were
more live dogs out there. This person did not know anything about
whether or not Ms. Davis was also keeping Mr. Rice informed throughout
the investigation.
TC
July 30, 2002
I would like to take this opportunity to address the rottie buried alive
at the
landfill and my status at the Humane Society of Greater Dallas. I
believe that
my reputation as a Cruelty Investigator has been proven time and time
again.
My concern with the Landfill incident was never where the dog came from,
but
that animal cruelty occurred at the landfill and then the city tampering
with
the evidence. I have faith in the Dallas Police Department and Mayor
Miller
to hold people accountable for their actions in this matter. I did
resign my
position from the Humane Society of Greater Dallas because of my
executive
director's actions in this matter and her undying need to defend Sam
Rice and
Dallas Animal Control. Regardless of what was said the night of the
original
incident, there were more conversations between my the executive
director and
Mr. Rice that I feel compromised my investigation. Also after the
animal
advisory meeting I was told that I was to continue to work with Dallas
Animal
Control on cases involving their department. I have a problem with this
because incident after incident they have only reacted when the media
became
involved. There are several outstanding Animal Control Officers working
for
the city but those that have lost their compassion and feel the need to
abuse
animals outweigh the good.
However, I created the Cruelty Investigation Division at the Humane
Society
of Greater Dallas. The logos, badges, cruelty notices, cruelty reports,
and
most importantly the strong relationship within the city of Dallas while
pursuing aggressive prosecutions. And I can do it again. I know that I
have
made a difference in the past 14 months and have saved many animals from
suffering. I would like to make it clear to the DFW area that I am
still
available for animal abuse investigations and guidance. I do not know
everything but I can at the least direct you to the proper contacts. My
email address will remain the same and as soon as funding is available a
new
animal cruelty agency will open with the same mission. The same
personal
service I provided and the same aggressive pursuance of animal abuse
cases in
the Dallas area. I have accepted a position with a Dallas Private
Investigation Agency and will be very flexible with my schedule. I
actually
look forward to working for an agency that has benefits and legitimate
work
ethics.
I am truly sorry, I feel I have let the animals and the animal welfare
community
down by resigning my position. But my integrity is what makes me who I
am.
Dee Stephens
Additonal Information Contacts
Tom Collinsworth at tomco917@earthlink.net
Dee Stephens at CrueltyDivision@aol.com
Donations Needed
The investigation is costing a great deal of time and money. Donations to help this investigation proceed until changes are made in the corruption in Dallas Animal Control can be mailed to:
Mariah's Fund
1208 Richland Oaks
Richardson, TX 75081
Letters and E-mails
Letter and e-mails to the Mayor and City Council would also be helpful. Please use the addresses and phone numbers listed to the upper left to send your letters, emails, and faxes to the council members.
HELP STOP THE CORRUPTION AT CITY OF DALLAS ANIMAL CONTROL
|